↓ Skip to main content

Three-dimensional visualization of cultural clusters in the 1878 yellow fever epidemic of New Orleans

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three-dimensional visualization of cultural clusters in the 1878 yellow fever epidemic of New Orleans
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-7-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Curtis

Abstract

An epidemic may exhibit different spatial patterns with a change in geographic scale, with each scale having different conduits and impediments to disease spread. Mapping disease at each of these scales often reveals different cluster patterns. This paper will consider this change of geographic scale in an analysis of yellow fever deaths for New Orleans in 1878. Global clustering for the whole city, will be followed by a focus on the French Quarter, then clusters of that area, and finally street-level patterns of a single cluster. The three-dimensional visualization capabilities of a GIS will be used as part of a cluster creation process that incorporates physical buildings in calculating mortality-to-mortality distance. Including nativity of the deceased will also capture cultural connection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Canada 2 5%
Kenya 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 30%
Student > Master 7 18%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,655,878
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#86
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,396
of 93,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them