↓ Skip to main content

Iron regulatory protein (IRP)-iron responsive element (IRE) signaling pathway in human neurodegenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iron regulatory protein (IRP)-iron responsive element (IRE) signaling pathway in human neurodegenerative diseases
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13024-017-0218-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Dong Zhou, Eng-King Tan

Abstract

The homeostasis of iron is vital to human health, and iron dyshomeostasis can lead to various disorders. Iron homeostasis is maintained by iron regulatory proteins (IRP1 and IRP2) and the iron-responsive element (IRE) signaling pathway. IRPs can bind to RNA stem-loops containing an IRE in the untranslated region (UTR) to manipulate translation of target mRNA. However, iron can bind to IRPs, leading to the dissociation of IRPs from the IRE and altered translation of target transcripts. Recently an IRE is found in the 5'-UTR of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and α-synuclein (α-Syn) transcripts. The levels of α-Syn, APP and amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) as well as protein aggregation can be down-regulated by IRPs but are up-regulated in the presence of iron accumulation. Therefore, inhibition of the IRE-modulated expression of APP and α-Syn or chelation of iron in patient's brains has therapeutic significance to human neurodegenerative diseases. Currently, new pre-drug IRE inhibitors with therapeutic effects have been identified and are at different stages of clinical trials for human neurodegenerative diseases. Although some promising drug candidates of chemical IRE inhibitors and iron-chelating agents have been identified and are being validated in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases, future studies are expected to further establish the clinical efficacy and safety of IRE inhibitors and iron-chelating agents in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Bachelor 37 18%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 25%
Neuroscience 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Chemistry 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 60 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#723
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,117
of 327,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.