↓ Skip to main content

A protocol for the delivery of cannabidiol (CBD) and combined CBD and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by vaporisation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 395)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A protocol for the delivery of cannabidiol (CBD) and combined CBD and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by vaporisation
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Solowij, Samantha J Broyd, Hendrika H van Hell, Arno Hazekamp

Abstract

Significant interest has emerged in the therapeutic and interactive effects of different cannabinoids. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to have anxiolytic and antipsychotic effects with high doses administered orally. We report a series of studies conducted to determine the vaporisation efficiency of high doses of cannabidiol (CBD), alone and in combination with [increment]9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), to achieve faster onset effects in experimental and clinical trials and emulate smoked cannabis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 21 12%
Other 18 10%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 11%
Chemistry 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 42 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#491,373
of 20,601,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#4
of 395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,384
of 250,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,601,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.