↓ Skip to main content

A protocol for the delivery of cannabidiol (CBD) and combined CBD and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by vaporisation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 482)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
18 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A protocol for the delivery of cannabidiol (CBD) and combined CBD and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by vaporisation
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Solowij, Samantha J Broyd, Hendrika H van Hell, Arno Hazekamp

Abstract

Significant interest has emerged in the therapeutic and interactive effects of different cannabinoids. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to have anxiolytic and antipsychotic effects with high doses administered orally. We report a series of studies conducted to determine the vaporisation efficiency of high doses of cannabidiol (CBD), alone and in combination with [increment]9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), to achieve faster onset effects in experimental and clinical trials and emulate smoked cannabis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Master 21 11%
Other 18 10%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Chemistry 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 48 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#634,118
of 25,261,240 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#4
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,549
of 262,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,261,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.