↓ Skip to main content

The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design
Published in
Trials, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-398
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Richards, Sarah Ross, Sarah Robens, Gunilla Borglin

Abstract

The 'cohort multiple Randomised Controlled Trial' (cmRCT) design has been proposed as a potential solution to poor recruitment into clinical trials. The design randomly selects participants eligible for experimental treatments from a pre-enrolled cohort of patients, recruiting participants to multiple trials from a single cohort. Controls remain unaware of their participation in specific trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 44%
Psychology 12 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%