You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex housing intervention: protocol for a mixed methods study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0138-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis P Watson, Jeani Young, Emily Ahonen, Huiping Xu, Macey Henderson, Valery Shuman, Randi Tolliver |
Abstract |
There is currently a lack of scientifically designed and tested implementation strategies. Such strategies are particularly important for highly complex interventions that require coordination between multiple parts to be successful. This paper presents a protocol for the development and testing of an implementation strategy for a complex intervention known as the Housing First model (HFM). Housing First is an evidence-based practice for chronically homeless individuals demonstrated to significantly improve a number of outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Psychology | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,970,297
of 23,921,147 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#931
of 1,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,995
of 261,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#24
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,921,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.