↓ Skip to main content

Africa and the global carbon cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Africa and the global carbon cycle
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A Williams, Niall P Hanan, Jason C Neff, Robert J Scholes, Joseph A Berry, A Scott Denning, David F Baker

Abstract

The African continent has a large and growing role in the global carbon cycle, with potentially important climate change implications. However, the sparse observation network in and around the African continent means that Africa is one of the weakest links in our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Here, we combine data from regional and global inventories as well as forward and inverse model analyses to appraise what is known about Africa's continental-scale carbon dynamics. With low fossil emissions and productivity that largely compensates respiration, land conversion is Africa's primary net carbon release, much of it through burning of forests. Savanna fire emissions, though large, represent a short-term source that is offset by ensuing regrowth. While current data suggest a near zero decadal-scale carbon balance, interannual climate fluctuations (especially drought) induce sizeable variability in net ecosystem productivity and savanna fire emissions such that Africa is a major source of interannual variability in global atmospheric CO2. Considering the continent's sizeable carbon stocks, their seemingly high vulnerability to anticipated climate and land use change, as well as growing populations and industrialization, Africa's carbon emissions and their interannual variability are likely to undergo substantial increases through the 21st century.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 351 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 20%
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 5%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 48 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 129 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 72 19%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 61 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,699,971
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#36
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,659
of 92,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them