↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and economic consequences of hospital-acquired resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and economic consequences of hospital-acquired resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2994-3-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dilip Nathwani, Gowri Raman, Katherine Sulham, Meghan Gavaghan, Vandana Menon

Abstract

Increasing rates of resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa in hospitalized patients constitute a major public health threat. We present a systematic review of the clinical and economic impact of this resistant pathogen.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 390 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 18%
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Researcher 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 71 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 54 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 52 13%
Unknown 96 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#769,699
of 21,321,698 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
#74
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,027
of 251,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.