You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining the relationship between face processing and social interaction behavior in children with and without autism spectrum disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1866-1955-6-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blythe A Corbett, Cassandra Newsom, Alexandra P Key, Lydia R Qualls, E Kale Edmiston |
| Abstract |
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show impairment in reciprocal social communication, which includes deficits in social cognition and behavior. Since social cognition and social behavior are considered to be interdependent, it is valuable to examine social processes on multiple levels of analysis. Neuropsychological measures of face processing often reveal deficits in social cognition in ASD including the ability to identify and remember facial information. However, the extent to which neuropsychological measures are associated with or predictive of real-world social behavior is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,788,263
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#362
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,517
of 236,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.