↓ Skip to main content

Modules, networks and systems medicine for understanding disease and aiding diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modules, networks and systems medicine for understanding disease and aiding diagnosis
Published in
Genome Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13073-014-0082-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mika Gustafsson, Colm E Nestor, Huan Zhang, Albert-László Barabási, Sergio Baranzini, Sören Brunak, Kian Fan Chung, Howard J Federoff, Anne-Claude Gavin, Richard R Meehan, Paola Picotti, Miguel Ángel Pujana, Nikolaus Rajewsky, Kenneth GC Smith, Peter J Sterk, Pablo Villoslada, Mikael Benson

Abstract

Many common diseases, such as asthma, diabetes or obesity, involve altered interactions between thousands of genes. High-throughput techniques (omics) allow identification of such genes and their products, but functional understanding is a formidable challenge. Network-based analyses of omics data have identified modules of disease-associated genes that have been used to obtain both a systems level and a molecular understanding of disease mechanisms. For example, in allergy a module was used to find a novel candidate gene that was validated by functional and clinical studies. Such analyses play important roles in systems medicine. This is an emerging discipline that aims to gain a translational understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying common diseases. In this review, we will explain and provide examples of how network-based analyses of omics data, in combination with functional and clinical studies, are aiding our understanding of disease, as well as helping to prioritize diagnostic markers or therapeutic candidate genes. Such analyses involve significant problems and limitations, which will be discussed. We also highlight the steps needed for clinical implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 268 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 18%
Student > Master 42 15%
Other 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 40 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 15%
Computer Science 37 13%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 51 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,243,375
of 24,256,961 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#496
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,682
of 263,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,256,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.