You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mimicking hypersensitivity pneumonitis as an uncommon initial presentation of chronic granulomatous disease in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-017-0719-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Liu, Jinrong Liu, Huimin Li, Yun Peng, Shunying Zhao |
| Abstract |
Dry cough, dyspenea and diffuse centrilobular nodules in both lungs of radiologic findings similar to hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) are rare initial presentation in chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). CGD is remarkable for increased susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections as well as high sensitivity to inciting antigens such as Aspergillus species due to dysregulated inflammation. We identified three children who had an initial presentation mimicking HP and were subsequently diagnosed as CGD. All patients developed invasive pulmonary A. fumigatus infection (IPAI) following systemic glucocorticoid therapy. Two of the three patients were found to have mutations in NCF1 gene and one patient in NCF2 gene. As HP is uncommon in children, we should consider the possibility of CGD in children with HP, even in mimicking HP patients with suggestive inhalation history and negative fungal cultures. A prompt diagnosis of CGD is essential to enable initiation of prophylactic antibacterial and antifungal therapies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,957,541
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,727
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,913
of 327,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.