↓ Skip to main content

Enrichment of statistical power for genome-wide association studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enrichment of statistical power for genome-wide association studies
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12915-014-0073-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng Li, Xiaolei Liu, Peter Bradbury, Jianming Yu, Yuan-Ming Zhang, Rory J Todhunter, Edward S Buckler, Zhiwu Zhang

Abstract

BackgroundThe inheritance of most human diseases and agriculturally important traits is controlled by many genes with small effects. Identifying these genes, while simultaneously controlling false positives, is challenging. Among available statistical methods, the mixed linear model (MLM) has been the most flexible and powerful for controlling population structure and individual unequal relatedness (kinship), the two common causes of spurious associations. The introduction of the compressed MLM (CMLM) method provided additional opportunities for optimization by adding two new model parameters: grouping algorithms and number of groups.ResultsThis study introduces another model parameter to develop an enriched CMLM (ECMLM). The parameter involves algorithms to define kinship between groups (that is, kinship algorithms). The ECMLM calculates kinship using several different algorithms and then chooses the best combination between kinship algorithms and grouping algorithms.ConclusionSimulations show that the ECMLM increases statistical power. In some cases, the magnitude of power gained by using ECMLM instead of CMLM is larger than the improvement found by using CMLM instead of MLM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 207 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 25%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Other 12 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 47 22%