↓ Skip to main content

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
Published in
Trials, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2244-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel I. Schlessinger, Sanjana Iyengar, Arianna F. Yanes, Jake M. Lazaroff, Victoria Godinez-Puig, Brian R. Chen, Anastasia O. Kurta, Jill K. Henley, Sarah G. Chiren, Karina C. Furlan, Jochen Schmitt, Stefanie Deckert, Emily Poon, Joseph F. Sobanko, Todd V. Cartee, Murad Alam, Ian A. Maher

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer worldwide. Treatment options include both surgical and topical modalities. Although risk of metastasis is low, basal cell carcinoma can be invasive and infiltrate important underlying structures such as bone or cartilage. While many clinical trials examining therapies for basal cell carcinoma exist, the lack of consensus in outcome reporting across all trials poses a concern. Proper evaluation and comparison of treatment modalities is challenging. In order to address the inconsistencies present, this project aims to determine a core set of outcomes which should be evaluated in all clinical trials of basal cell carcinoma. Outcomes will be extracted over four phases: (1) a systematic literature review, (2) patient interviews, (3) other published sources, and (4) stakeholder involvement. Potential outcomes will then be examined by the Steering Committee, who may add or remove outcomes. The Delphi process will then be performed to condense the list of outcomes generated. Two rounds of Delphi surveys will be performed with two groups of participants - physicians and patients. A consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders will be conducted after the Delphi exercise to further select outcomes, taking into account participant scores. By the end of the meeting, members will vote and decide on a final recommended set of core outcomes. For the duration of the study, we will be in collaboration with both the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN). This study aims to develop a core outcome set to guide assessment in clinical trials on basal cell carcinoma. The end-goal is to improve the consistency of outcome reporting and allow proper evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 33%