↓ Skip to main content

The Stroke Oxygen Study (SO2S) - a multi-center study to assess whether routine oxygen treatment in the first 72 hours after a stroke improves long-term outcome: study protocol for a randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Stroke Oxygen Study (SO2S) - a multi-center study to assess whether routine oxygen treatment in the first 72 hours after a stroke improves long-term outcome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Roffe, Tracy Nevatte, Peter Crome, Richard Gray, Julius Sim, Sarah Pountain, Linda Handy, Peter Handy

Abstract

Mild hypoxia is common in stroke patients and may have significant adverse effects on the ischemic brain after stroke. The use of oxygen treatment is rapidly increasing in European stroke units but is not without side effects. It impedes early mobilization, could pose an infection risk, and may encourage the formation of toxic free radicals, leading to further damage to the ischemic brain. In the Stroke Oxygen Pilot Study (2 or 3 L/min for 72 hours) neurological recovery at one week was better in the oxygen group than in controls, and after correction for difference in baseline stroke severity and prognostic factors, there was a trend to better outcome with oxygen at six months. Oxygen was as effective in mild as in severe strokes.Oxygen saturation is lower at night than during the day, and episodes of oxygen desaturation are common during sleep. Nocturnal oxygen supplementation is likely to reduce the burden of hypoxia without interfering with daytime mobilization and rehabilitation.Before wider use of oxygen supplementation becomes established it is important to obtain better evidence on which patients benefit from such treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 26 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 31 46%