Title |
A flexible Bayesian method for detecting allelic imbalance in RNA-seq data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-920 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luis G León-Novelo, Lauren M McIntyre, Justin M Fear, Rita M Graze |
Abstract |
One method of identifying cis regulatory differences is to analyze allele-specific expression (ASE) and identify cases of allelic imbalance (AI). RNA-seq is the most common way to measure ASE and a binomial test is often applied to determine statistical significance of AI. This implicitly assumes that there is no bias in estimation of AI. However, bias has been found to result from multiple factors including: genome ambiguity, reference quality, the mapping algorithm, and biases in the sequencing process. Two alternative approaches have been developed to handle bias: adjusting for bias using a statistical model and filtering regions of the genome suspected of harboring bias. Existing statistical models which account for bias rely on information from DNA controls, which can be cost prohibitive for large intraspecific studies. In contrast, data filtering is inexpensive and straightforward, but necessarily involves sacrificing a portion of the data. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 25% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 33% |
Researcher | 20 | 23% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 22% |
Mathematics | 8 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |