↓ Skip to main content

Reduction in adverse effects of tracking devices on waterfowl requires better measuring and reporting

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 210)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction in adverse effects of tracking devices on waterfowl requires better measuring and reporting
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40317-017-0139-6
Authors

Thomas K. Lameris, Erik Kleyheeg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 25%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 44%
Environmental Science 20 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#794,632
of 20,513,123 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#17
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,165
of 338,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,513,123 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.