↓ Skip to main content

The oxygen-independent metabolism of cyclic monoterpenes in Castellaniella defragrans 65Phen

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The oxygen-independent metabolism of cyclic monoterpenes in Castellaniella defragrans 65Phen
Published in
BMC Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-14-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Petasch, Eva-Maria Disch, Stephanie Markert, Dörte Becher, Thomas Schweder, Bruno Hüttel, Richard Reinhardt, Jens Harder

Abstract

The facultatively anaerobic betaproteobacterium Castellaniella defragrans 65Phen utilizes acyclic, monocyclic and bicyclic monoterpenes as sole carbon source under oxic as well as anoxic conditions. A biotransformation pathway of the acyclic β-myrcene required linalool dehydratase-isomerase as initial enzyme acting on the hydrocarbon. An in-frame deletion mutant did not use myrcene, but was able to grow on monocyclic monoterpenes. The genome sequence and a comparative proteome analysis together with a random transposon mutagenesis were conducted to identify genes involved in the monocyclic monoterpene metabolism. Metabolites accumulating in cultures of transposon and in-frame deletion mutants disclosed the degradation pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Chemistry 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,730,142
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,999
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,890
of 228,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#28
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.