↓ Skip to main content

A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions
Published in
Plant Methods, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13007-017-0226-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominic Williams, Avril Britten, Susan McCallum, Hamlyn Jones, Matt Aitkenhead, Alison Karley, Ken Loades, Ankush Prashar, Julie Graham

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging is a technology that can be used to monitor plant responses to stress. Hyperspectral images have a full spectrum for each pixel in the image, 400-2500 nm in this case, giving detailed information about the spectral reflectance of the plant. Although this technology has been used in laboratory-based controlled lighting conditions for early detection of plant disease, the transfer of such technology to imaging plants in field conditions presents a number of challenges. These include problems caused by varying light levels and difficulties of separating the target plant from its background. Here we present an automated method that has been developed to segment raspberry plants from the background using a selected spectral ratio combined with edge detection. Graph theory was used to minimise a cost function to detect the continuous boundary between uninteresting plants and the area of interest. The method includes automatic detection of a known reflectance tile which was kept constantly within the field of view for all image scans. A method to split images containing rows of multiple raspberry plants into individual plants was also developed. Validation was carried out by comparison of plant height and density measurements with manually scored values. A reasonable correlation was found between these manual scores and measurements taken from the images (r(2) = 0.75 for plant height). These preliminary steps are an essential requirement before detailed spectral analysis of the plants can be achieved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Engineering 10 15%
Computer Science 5 7%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,367,260
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#717
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,758
of 329,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.