↓ Skip to main content

Prospective genetic profiling of squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma in Japanese patients by multitarget assays

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective genetic profiling of squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma in Japanese patients by multitarget assays
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Masakuni Serizawa, Yasuhiro Koh, Mitsuhiro Isaka, Toshiaki Takahashi, Tetsuhiko Taira, Akira Ono, Tomohiro Maniwa, Shoji Takahashi, Keita Mori, Masahiro Endo, Masato Abe, Isamu Hayashi, Takashi Nakajima, Yasuhisa Ohde, Nobuyuki Yamamoto

Abstract

Despite considerable recent progress in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, there has been little progress in the development of efficacious molecular targeted therapies for squamous cell lung cancer. In addition to the recent comprehensive genome-wide characterization of squamous cell lung cancer, it is also important to genotype this form of cancer. We therefore conducted the Shizuoka Lung Cancer Mutation Study to analyze driver mutations in patients with thoracic malignancies. Here we report the results of genotyping in patients with squamous cell lung cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,137,513
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,518
of 8,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,321
of 260,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#38
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.