↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of the major fungal agents of human and animal Sporotrichosis: Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of the major fungal agents of human and animal Sporotrichosis: Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus M Teixeira, Luiz GP de Almeida, Paula Kubitschek-Barreira, Fernanda L Alves, Érika S Kioshima, Ana KR Abadio, Larissa Fernandes, Lorena S Derengowski, Karen S Ferreira, Rangel C Souza, Jeronimo C Ruiz, Nathalia C de Andrade, Hugo C Paes, André M Nicola, Patrícia Albuquerque, Alexandra L Gerber, Vicente P Martins, Luisa DF Peconick, Alan Viggiano Neto, Claudia B Chaucanez, Patrícia A Silva, Oberdan L Cunha, Fabiana FM de Oliveira, Tayná C dos Santos, Amanda LN Barros, Marco A Soares, Luciana M de Oliveira, Marjorie M Marini, Héctor Villalobos-Duno, Marcel ML Cunha, Sybren de Hoog, José F da Silveira, Bernard Henrissat, Gustavo A Niño-Vega, Patrícia S Cisalpino, Héctor M Mora-Montes, Sandro R Almeida, Jason E Stajich, Leila M Lopes-Bezerra, Ana TR Vasconcelos, Maria SS Felipe

Abstract

The fungal genus Sporothrix includes at least four human pathogenic species. One of these species, S. brasiliensis, is the causal agent of a major ongoing zoonotic outbreak of sporotrichosis in Brazil. Elsewhere, sapronoses are caused by S. schenckii and S. globosa. The major aims on this comparative genomic study are: 1) to explore the presence of virulence factors in S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis; 2) to compare S. brasiliensis, which is cat-transmitted and infects both humans and cats with S. schenckii, mainly a human pathogen; 3) to compare these two species to other human pathogens (Onygenales) with similar thermo-dimorphic behavior and to other plant-associated Sordariomycetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,274,726
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,730
of 10,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,286
of 260,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#52
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.