↓ Skip to main content

Care practices and traditional beliefs related to neonatal jaundice in northern Vietnam: a population-based, cross-sectional descriptive study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Care practices and traditional beliefs related to neonatal jaundice in northern Vietnam: a population-based, cross-sectional descriptive study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-14-264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loc T Le, John Colin Partridge, Bich H Tran, Vui T Le, Tuan K Duong, Ha T Nguyen, Thomas B Newman

Abstract

The National Hospital of Pediatrics in Vietnam performed >200 exchange transfusions annually (2006-08), often on infants presenting encephalopathic from lower-level hospitals. As factors delaying care-seeking are not known, we sought to study care practices and traditional beliefs relating to neonatal jaundice in northern Vietnam.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 24%
Unspecified 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,730,142
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,251
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,243
of 255,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#36
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.