↓ Skip to main content

Histologic and spectroscopic study of pluripotent stem cells after implant in ocular traumatic injuries in a murine model

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histologic and spectroscopic study of pluripotent stem cells after implant in ocular traumatic injuries in a murine model
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/scrt509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Jesús Vázquez-Zapién, Marlon Rojas-López, Raúl Jacobo Delgado-Macuil, Luis Rubén Martínez-Nava, David Guillermo Pérez-Ishiwara, Mónica Maribel Mata-Miranda

Abstract

The ocular trauma is defined as a trauma caused by blunt or penetrating mechanisms on the eyeball and its peripheral structures, causing damage with different degrees of affectation with temporary or permanent visual function compromise. The ocular trauma is a major cause of preventable blindness worldwide; it constitutes the 7% of all corporal injury, and 10-15% of all eye diseases. The regenerative medicine research has opened the possibility to use stem cells as a source of cell replacement; so that experimental studies on embryonic stem cells and bone marrow stem cells have been carried out. In this study we analyzed the histopathological and spectroscopic changes in ocular tissue with trauma, treated with mouse pluripotent stem cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Researcher 4 20%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,620,156
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#331
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,473
of 259,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.