↓ Skip to main content

Internet-based randomised controlled trials for the evaluation of complementary and alternative medicines: probiotics in spondyloarthropathy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet-based randomised controlled trials for the evaluation of complementary and alternative medicines: probiotics in spondyloarthropathy
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-9-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinead Brophy, Claire L Burrows, Caroline Brooks, Michael B Gravenor, Stefan Siebert, Stephen J Allen

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) is widely debated because of a lack of clinical trials. The internet may provide an effective and economical approach for undertaking randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of low-risk interventions. We investigated whether the internet could be used to perform an internet-based RCT of a CAM fulfilling the revised CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement quality checklist for reporting of RCTs. A secondary aim was to examine the effect of probiotics compared to placebo in terms of well-being over 12 weeks.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Psychology 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 20 22%