You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Access to health care and employment status of people with disabilities in South India, the SIDE (South India Disability Evidence) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Murthy Venkata S Gudlavalleti, Neena John, Komal Allagh, Jayanthi Sagar, Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, Srikrishna S Ramachandra, South India Disability Evidence Study Group |
| Abstract |
Data shows that people with disability are more disadvantaged in accessing health, education and employment opportunities compared to people without a disability. There is a lack of credible documented evidence on health care access and barriers to access from India. The South India Disability Evidence (SIDE) Study was undertaken to understand the health needs of people with disabilities, and barriers to accessing health services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 18% |
| Unknown | 85 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 96 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,209,560
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,340
of 15,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,469
of 262,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#97
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.