You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-4-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harry Minas, Anthony F Jorm |
| Abstract |
In both developing countries and in relation to cultural minorities there have been calls to scale up mental health services and for evidence-informed policy and practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 25% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#594
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,429
of 192,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.