You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The impact of parenthood on Canadians’ objectively measured physical activity: an examination of cross-sectional population-based data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1127 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anca Gaston, Sarah A Edwards, Amy Doelman, Jo Ann Tober |
Abstract |
Parenthood has been associated with declines in leisure-time exercise and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), but less is known about its impact on sedentary time and light-intensity activity. Although the health benefits of MVPA are well established, a growing body of research has been showing that even after controlling for MVPA levels, a detrimental dose-response association exists between sedentary time and adverse health outcomes and a beneficial dose-response association exists for light-intensity activity. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 31% |
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,974,508
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,198
of 14,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,810
of 262,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#42
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.