↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient adequacy during weight loss interventions: a randomized study in women comparing the dietary intake in a meal replacement group with a traditional food group

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrient adequacy during weight loss interventions: a randomized study in women comparing the dietary intake in a meal replacement group with a traditional food group
Published in
Nutrition Journal, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-6-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith M Ashley, Holly Herzog, Sharon Clodfelter, Vicki Bovee, Jon Schrage, Chris Pritsos

Abstract

Safe and effective weight control strategies are needed to stem the current obesity epidemic. The objective of this one-year study was to document and compare the macronutrient and micronutrient levels in the foods chosen by women following two different weight reduction interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Psychology 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#10,140,382
of 18,707,984 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#884
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,089
of 243,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#92
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,707,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.