↓ Skip to main content

Loss of control eating with and without the undue influence of weight or shape on self-evaluation: evidence from an adolescent population

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loss of control eating with and without the undue influence of weight or shape on self-evaluation: evidence from an adolescent population
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40337-014-0031-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmel Harrison, Jonathan Mond, Caroline Bentley, Kassandra Gratwick-Sarll, Elizabeth Rieger, Bryan Rodgers

Abstract

The overvaluation of weight and/or shape ("overvaluation"), a diagnostic criterion for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, is increasingly supported for inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria of binge eating disorder (BED). However, current evidence has been largely confined to adult populations. The current study aims to examine the status of overvaluation among adolescents with loss of control (LOC) eating recruited from a large, population-based sample.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,092,410
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#427
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,569
of 260,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.