You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Georg Hoffmann |
| Abstract |
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term efficacy of diet plus exercise (D + E) vs. diet (D), D + E vs. exercise (E) and D vs. E on anthropometric outcomes and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#294,799
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#27
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,017
of 264,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.