You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploration of molecular genetic etiology for Korean cochlear implantees with severe to profound hearing loss and its implication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-014-0167-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joo Hyun Park, Nayoung K D Kim, Ah Reum Kim, Jihye Rhee, Seung Ha Oh, Ja-Won Koo, Jae-Yong Nam, Woong-Yang Park, Byung Yoon Choi |
| Abstract |
Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) requires cochlear implantation (CI) for auditory rehabilitation. Etiologic diagnoses can contribute to candidacy selection and decision-making regarding the timing of successful CI. However, few studies have been performed to address the etiologic spectrum of severe SNHL in the population where there is no consanguineous marriage and the majority of SNHL cases are sporadic in small sized families. The authors sought to comprehensively understand the etiologies of Korean cochlear implantees by incorporating the targeted resequencing of 204 candidate deafness genes (TRS-204) and a phenotype-driven candidate gene approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,309,583
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,788
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,147
of 262,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#42
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.