↓ Skip to main content

Provision of chlamydia testing, and training of primary health care staff about chlamydia testing, across four European countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Provision of chlamydia testing, and training of primary health care staff about chlamydia testing, across four European countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anneli Uusküla, Ellie J Ricketts, Claire Rugman, Ruth R Kalda, Hans Fredlund, Johan Hedlund, Brigitte Dunais, Pia P Touboul, Cliodna McNulty

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to describe and compare chlamydia testing provided by general practitioners (GPs) in four selected European countries with well-developed primary health care systems and high reported chlamydia rates; we aimed to compare contrasting countries where chlamydia testing is provided by GPs (England, Sweden) with countries where primary care chlamydia testing is absent or very limited (France, Estonia).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Librarian 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,922,782
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,038
of 14,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,154
of 262,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#187
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.