You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ownership and usage of insecticide-treated bed nets after free distribution via a voucher system in two provinces of Mozambique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-9-222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre Macedo de Oliveira, Adam Wolkon, Ramesh Krishnamurthy, Marcy Erskine, Dana P Crenshaw, Jacquelin Roberts, Francisco Saúte |
| Abstract |
Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) are an efficacious intervention for malaria prevention. During a national immunization campaign in Mozambique, vouchers, which were to be redeemed at a later date for free ITNs, were distributed in Manica and Sofala provinces. A survey to evaluate ITN ownership and usage post-campaign was conducted. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Sudan | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 29% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,277,616
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#500
of 5,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,501
of 94,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.