↓ Skip to main content

Differences in immunoreactive trypsin values between type of feeding and ethnicity in neonatal cystic fibrosis screening: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in immunoreactive trypsin values between type of feeding and ethnicity in neonatal cystic fibrosis screening: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0166-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernesto Cortés, Ana María Roldán, Antonio Palazón-Bru, María Mercedes Rizo-Baeza, Herminia Manero, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén

Abstract

BackgroundWe studied the differences in immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) associated individually with the age of the newborn, ethnicity and environmental temperature. In this study, we determine the overall influence of environmental temperature at birth, gender, feeding, gestational age, maternal age and ethnic origin on an abnormal IRT result.MethodsCross-sectional observational study. A sample was selected of newborns from Alicante (Spain) who underwent neonatal CF screening in 2012¿2013. Primary variable: abnormal IRT levels (¿65 ng/ml). Secondary variables: gender, maternal origin, maternal age (years) (<20, 20¿40, >40), gestational age (weeks) (<32, 32¿37, >37), type of feeding (natural, formula, mixed and special nutrition), >20 days from birth to blood collection, and average temperature during the month of birth (in°C). Using a multivariate logistic regression model the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were estimated to analyze the association between atypical IRT levels and the study variables. The ¿ error was 5% and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the most relevant parameters.ResultsOf a total of 13,310 samples, 199 were abnormal (1.34%). Significant associated factors: feeding method (natural¿¿¿OR¿=¿1; mixed¿¿¿OR¿=¿0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.89; formula¿¿¿OR¿=¿0.72, 95% CI: 0.48-1.07; special¿¿¿OR¿=¿21.88, 95% CI: 6.92-69.14; p¿<¿0.001).ConclusionsNewborns receiving special nutrition have a 20-fold higher risk for abnormal IRT levels, and screening is advisable once normalized feeding is initiated. It is advisable to consider ethnic variability. Seasonality was not important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,720,884
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,467
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,881
of 262,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#34
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.