↓ Skip to main content

Effects of energy drink major bioactive compounds on the performance of young adults in fitness and cognitive tests: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of energy drink major bioactive compounds on the performance of young adults in fitness and cognitive tests: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-014-0044-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximiliano Kammerer, Jaime A Jaramillo, Adriana García, Juan C Calderón, Luis H Valbuena

Abstract

The consumption of beverages containing caffeine and taurine before exercising has been associated with increased physical and psychological performances and has been promoted to support the emotional state and provide vitality to consumers. However, there are contradictory results on these issues, it is not clear the effect of every major compound in relation to the whole effect of the beverages and there is a lack in knowledge about their degree of safety for consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 23%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 36 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Psychology 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#901,039
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#225
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,520
of 448,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#210
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.