↓ Skip to main content

Intentions to use contraceptives in Pakistan: implications for behavior change campaigns

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intentions to use contraceptives in Pakistan: implications for behavior change campaigns
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sohail Agha

Abstract

Since 1990-91, traditional method use has increased at a faster rate in Pakistan than modern method use. The importance of hormonal methods or the IUD has diminished and that of traditional methods has increased in the method mix. There is a need to identify factors motivating and deterring the adoption of specific family planning methods among married men and women in Pakistan.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 22%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 57 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Social Sciences 36 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Psychology 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,448,111
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,872
of 14,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,469
of 94,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#36
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.