↓ Skip to main content

Medical education and the healthcare system - why does the curriculum need to be reformed?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical education and the healthcare system - why does the curriculum need to be reformed?
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0213-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo A Quintero

Abstract

Medical education has been the subject of ongoing debate since the early 1900s. The core of the discussion is about the importance of scientific knowledge on biological understanding at the expense of its social and humanistic characteristics. Unfortunately, reforms to the medical curriculum are still based on a biological vision of the health-illness process. In order to respond to the current needs of society, which is education's main objective, the learning processes of physicians and their instruction must change once again. The priority is the concept of the health-illness process that is primarily social and cultural, into which the biological and psychological aspects are inserted. A new curriculum has been developed that addresses a comprehensive instruction of the biological, psychological, social, and cultural (historical) aspects of medicine, with opportunities for students to acquire leadership, teamwork, and communication skills in order to introduce improvements into the healthcare systems where they work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 57 33%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,990,565
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,334
of 3,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,120
of 260,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#34
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.