↓ Skip to main content

Adult stem cells and tissue engineering strategies for salivary gland regeneration: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Biomaterials Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult stem cells and tissue engineering strategies for salivary gland regeneration: a review
Published in
Biomaterials Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2055-7124-18-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chankee Yoo, Jeremy B Vines, Grant Alexander, Kyle Murdock, Patrick Hwang, Ho-Wook Jun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Engineering 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,409,041
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#24
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,266
of 228,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.