↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of central venous saturation as a predictor of thiamine deficiency in critically ill patients: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness of central venous saturation as a predictor of thiamine deficiency in critically ill patients: a case report
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40560-017-0255-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genri Numata, Satoshi Kodera, Hiroyuki Kiriyama, Atsuko Nakayama, Eisuke Amiya, Arihiro Kiyosue, Masaru Hatano, Eiki Takimoto, Masafumi Watanabe, Issei Komuro

Abstract

Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) reflects the balance of oxygen delivery and consumption. Low ScvO2 indicates the presence of inadequate oxygen delivery, while high ScvO2 indicates reduced oxygen consumption and is sometimes associated with a high mortality rate in critically ill patients from dysoxia. Thiamine is an essential cofactor in cellular aerobic metabolism. Thiamine deficiency is more prevalent than was previously thought, and underlies severe conditions in critically ill patients. However, currently, there is no rapid diagnostic test for thiamine deficiency. Considering oxygen flux, high ScvO2 might be associated with thiamine deficiency. A 70-year-old man admitted to the hospital with chief complaint of malaise and edema. He was diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection function and was treated with loop diuretics, which resulted in shock. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pumping was indicated. The right heart catheter showed high ScvO2, normal cardiac output, and low systemic vascular resistance. Thiamine deficiency was suspected and we started the thiamine infusion. His hemodynamic status improved after thiamine replacement. After his recovery, it was discovered that he had a 1-month history of anorexia and thiamine deficiency. His final diagnosis was beriberi. The current case showed the relation between thiamine deficiency and high ScvO2. A literature review also suggested that thiamine deficiency is associated with high ScvO2. Thiamine deficiency causes impaired tissue oxygen extraction, which could lead to high ScvO2. In this context, high ScvO2 might serve as a predictor of thiamine deficiency in critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,781,311
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#404
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,089
of 343,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.