↓ Skip to main content

Cellular origin of the viral capsid-like bacterial microcompartments

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular origin of the viral capsid-like bacterial microcompartments
Published in
Biology Direct, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13062-017-0197-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mart Krupovic, Eugene V. Koonin

Abstract

ᅟ: Bacterial microcompartments (BMC) are proteinaceous organelles that structurally resemble viral capsids, but encapsulate enzymes that perform various specialized biochemical reactions in the cell cytoplasm. The BMC are constructed from two major shell proteins, BMC-H and BMC-P, which form the facets and vertices of the icosahedral assembly, and are functionally equivalent to the major and minor capsid proteins of viruses, respectively. This equivalence notwithstanding, neither of the BMC proteins displays structural similarity to known capsid proteins, rendering the origins of the BMC enigmatic. Here, using structural and sequence comparisons, we show that both BMC-H and BMC-P, most likely, were exapted from bona fide cellular proteins, namely, PII signaling protein and OB-fold domain-containing protein, respectively. This finding is in line with the hypothesis that many major viral structural proteins have been recruited from cellular proteomes. This article was reviewed by Igor Zhulin, Jeremy Selengut and Narayanaswamy Srinivasan. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers' reports section.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Chemistry 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,287,488
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#89
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,381
of 331,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.