↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in men with large prostates (≥50 cm3)

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in men with large prostates (≥50 cm3)
Published in
Radiation Oncology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13014-014-0241-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Einsley Janowski, Leonard N Chen, Joy S Kim, Siyuan Lei, Simeng Suy, Brian Collins, John Lynch, Anatoly Dritschilo, Sean Collins

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with large prostate volumes have been shown to have higher rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities after conventional radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which delivers fewer high-dose fractions of radiation treatment, is unknown for large prostate volume prostate cancer patients. We report our early experience using SBRT for localized prostate cancer in patients with large prostate volumes.Methods57 patients with prostate volumes ¿50 cm3 prior to treatment with SBRT for localized prostate carcinoma and with a minimum follow up of two years were included in this retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Treatment was delivered using Cyberknife (Accuray) with doses of 35¿36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Biochemical control was assessed using the Phoenix definition. Toxicities were scored using the CTCAE v.4. Quality of life was assessed using the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26.Results57 patients (23 low-, 25 intermediate- and 9 high-risk according to the D¿Amico classification) at a median age of 69 years (range, 54¿83 years) received SBRT with a median follow-up of 2.9 years. The median prostate size was 62.9 cm3 (range 50¿138.7 cm3). 33.3% of patients received ADT. The median pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.5 ng/ml and decreased to a median PSA of 0.4 ng/ml by 2 years (p <0.0001). A mean baseline AUA symptom score of 7.5 significantly increased to 13 at 1 month (p =0.001) and returned to baseline by 3 months (p =0.21). 23% of patients experienced a late transient urinary symptom flare in the first two years following treatment. Mean baseline EPIC bowel scores of 95.8 decreased to 78.1 at 1 month (p <0.0001), but subsequently improved to 93.5 three months (p =0.08). The 2-year actuarial incidence rates of GU and GI toxicity¿¿¿grade 2 were 49.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Two patients (3.5%) experienced grade 3 urinary toxicity, and no patient experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity.ConclusionsSBRT for clinically localized prostate cancer was well tolerated in men with large prostate volumes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,167,654
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#93
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,686
of 258,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#3
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.