You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early career researchers want Open Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:NL:UI:10-1874-357478
|
| Authors |
Andrea Farnham, Christoph Kurz, Mehmet Ali Öztürk, Monica Solbiati, Oona Myllyntaus, Jordy Meekes, Tra My Pham, Clara Paz, Magda Langiewicz, Sophie Andrews, Liisa Kanninen, Chantal Agbemabiese, Arzu Tugce Guler, Jeffrey Durieux, Sarah Jasim, Olivia Viessmann, Stefano Frattini, Danagul Yembergenova, Carla Marin Benito, Marion Porte, Anaïs Grangeray-Vilmint, Rafael Prieto Curiel, Carin Rehncrona, Tareq Malas, Flavia Esposito, Kristina Hettne |
| Abstract |
Open Science is encouraged by the European Union and many other political and scientific institutions. However, scientific practice is proving slow to change. We propose, as early career researchers, that it is our task to change scientific research into open scientific research and commit to Open Science principles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 16% |
| United States | 34 | 12% |
| Germany | 18 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Italy | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| Belgium | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 82 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 59% |
| Scientists | 91 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Librarian | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 29% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#206,741
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#63
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,134
of 340,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#2
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.