↓ Skip to main content

Flexible and scalable genotyping-by-sequencing strategies for population studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flexible and scalable genotyping-by-sequencing strategies for population studies
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Heffelfinger, Christopher A Fragoso, Maria A Moreno, John D Overton, John P Mottinger, Hongyu Zhao, Joe Tohme, Stephen L Dellaporta

Abstract

Many areas critical to agricultural production and research, such as the breeding and trait mapping in plants and livestock, require robust and scalable genotyping platforms. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is a one such method highly suited to non-human organisms. In the GBS protocol, genomic DNA is fractionated via restriction digest, then reduced representation is achieved through size selection. Since many restriction sites are conserved across a species, the sequenced portion of the genome is highly consistent within a population. This makes the GBS protocol highly suited for experiments that require surveying large numbers of markers within a population, such as those involving genetic mapping, breeding, and population genomics. We have modified the GBS technology in a number of ways. Custom, enzyme specific adaptors have been replaced with standard Illumina adaptors compatible with blunt-end restriction enzymes. Multiplexing is achieved through a dual barcoding system, and bead-based library preparation protocols allows for in-solution size selection and eliminates the need for columns and gels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Belgium 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 173 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 26%
Researcher 45 24%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 18%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,448,111
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,592
of 10,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,018
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#88
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,641 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.