↓ Skip to main content

Minimal nutrition intervention with high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient-dense food supplement improves body composition and exercise benefits in overweight adults: A randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimal nutrition intervention with high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient-dense food supplement improves body composition and exercise benefits in overweight adults: A randomized controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-5-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M Lockwood, Jordan R Moon, Sarah E Tobkin, Ashley A Walter, Abbie E Smith, Vincent J Dalbo, Joel T Cramer, Jeffrey R Stout

Abstract

Exercise and high-protein/reduced-carbohydrate and -fat diets have each been shown separately, or in combination with an energy-restricted diet to improve body composition and health in sedentary, overweight (BMI > 25) adults. The current study, instead, examined the physiological response to 10 weeks of combined aerobic and resistance exercise (EX) versus exercise + minimal nutrition intervention designed to alter the macronutrient profile, in the absence of energy restriction, using a commercially available high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient-dense food supplement (EXFS); versus control (CON).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Sports and Recreations 19 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,875,582
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#405
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,863
of 81,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.