↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical insulin-like growth factor-1 therapy for sudden deafness refractory to systemic corticosteroid treatment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical insulin-like growth factor-1 therapy for sudden deafness refractory to systemic corticosteroid treatment
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0219-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayuki Nakagawa, Kozo Kumakawa, Shin-ichi Usami, Naohito Hato, Keiji Tabuchi, Mariko Takahashi, Keizo Fujiwara, Akira Sasaki, Shizuo Komune, Tatsunori Sakamoto, Harukazu Hiraumi, Norio Yamamoto, Shiro Tanaka, Harue Tada, Michio Yamamoto, Atsushi Yonezawa, Toshiko Ito-Ihara, Takafumi Ikeda, Akira Shimizu, Yasuhiko Tabata, Juichi Ito

Abstract

To date, no therapeutic option has been established for sudden deafness refractory to systemic corticosteroids. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of topical insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) therapy in comparison to intratympanic corticosteroid therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,363,788
of 23,846,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,433
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,845
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#56
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,846,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.