↓ Skip to main content

Exploring psychosis and bipolar disorder in women: a critical review of the qualitative literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring psychosis and bipolar disorder in women: a critical review of the qualitative literature
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0281-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Wittkowski, Laura K McGrath, Sarah Peters

Abstract

BackgroundThe experiences of women with severe mental illness warrant particular consideration to identify the strategies they use to facilitate recovery. This review systematically examined women¿s experiences of psychosis and bipolar disorder.MethodsFollowing an extensive database search, 13 studies met inclusion criteria. Noblit and Hare¿s metasynthesis approach was used to synthesise these qualitative studies exploring the experiences of 250 women, of which 78 (31.2%) were also mothers.ResultsTwelve sub-ordinate themes were identified and categorised into three overarching themes: 1) women¿s beliefs about illness, 2) perceived consequences of illness, and 3) strategies used to cope with illness. Contextual factors and spiritual beliefs were found to be important in these women¿s illness appraisals. Women incorporated diagnosis-related information into illness models if it was concordant with their existing beliefs.ConclusionsWomen reported negative illness consequences relating to stigma, loss of self-determination and changes to relationships. They employed various strategies in order to cope with illness. Barriers to strategy use and clinical recommendations are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,934,773
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,075
of 4,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,682
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#16
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.