You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic epidemiology of a protracted hospital outbreak caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiin Birmingham, England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-014-0070-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mihail R Halachev, Jacqueline Z-M Chan, Chrystala I Constantinidou, Nicola Cumley, Craig Bradley, Matthew Smith-Banks, Beryl Oppenheim, Mark J Pallen |
| Abstract |
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii commonly causes hospital outbreaks. However, within an outbreak, it can be difficult to identify the routes of cross-infection rapidly and accurately enough to inform infection control. Here, we describe a protracted hospital outbreak of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, in which whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to obtain a high-resolution view of the relationships between isolates. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 44% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 40% |
| Scientists | 13 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#315,743
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#50
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,895
of 365,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.