↓ Skip to main content

Clinical utility of chitotriosidase enzyme activity in nephropathic cystinosis

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical utility of chitotriosidase enzyme activity in nephropathic cystinosis
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0155-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed A Elmonem, Samuel H Makar, Lambertus van den Heuvel, Hanan Abdelaziz, Safaa M Abdelrahman, Xavier Bossuyt, Mirian C Janssen, Elisabeth AM Cornelissen, Dirk J Lefeber, Leo AB Joosten, Marwa M Nabhan, Fanny O Arcolino, Fayza A Hassan, Héloïse P Gaide Chevronnay, Neveen A Soliman, Elena Levtchenko

Abstract

BackgroundNephropathic cystinosis is an inherited autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder characterized by the pathological accumulation and crystallization of cystine inside different cell types. WBC cystine determination forms the basis for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring with the cystine depleting drug (cysteamine). The chitotriosidase enzyme is a human chitinase, produced by activated macrophages. Its elevation is documented in several lysosomal storage disorders. Although, about 6% of Caucasians have enzyme deficiency due to homozygosity of 24-bp duplication mutation in the chitotriosidase gene, it is currently established as a screening marker and therapeutic monitor for Gaucher¿s disease.MethodsPlasma chitotriosidase activity was measured in 45 cystinotic patients, and compared with 87 healthy controls and 54 renal disease patients with different degrees of renal failure (CKD1-5). Chitotriosidase levels were also correlated with WBC cystine in 32 treated patients. Furthermore, we incubated control human macrophages in-vitro with different concentrations of cystine crystals and monitored the response of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-¿) and chitotriosidase activity. We also compared plasma chitotriosidase activity in cystinotic knocked-out (n¿=¿10) versus wild-type mice (n¿=¿10).ResultsPlasma chitotriosidase activity in cystinotic patients (0¿3880, median 163 nmol/ml/h) was significantly elevated compared to healthy controls (0¿90, median 18 nmol/ml/h) and to CKD patients (0¿321, median 52 nmol/ml/h), P¿<¿0.001 for both groups. Controls with decreased renal function had mild to moderate chitotriosidase elevations; however, their levels were significantly lower than in cystinotic patients with comparable degree of renal insufficiency. Chitotriosidase activity positively correlated with WBC cystine content for patients on cysteamine therapy (r¿=¿0.8), P¿<¿0.001. In culture, human control macrophages engulfed cystine crystals and released TNF-¿ into culture supernatant in a crystal concentration dependent manner. Chitotriosidase activity was also significantly increased in macrophage supernatant and cell-lysate. Furthermore, chitotriosidase activity was significantly higher in cystinotic knocked-out than in the wild-type mice, P¿=¿0.003.ConclusionsThis study indicates that cystine crystals are potent activators of human macrophages and that chitotriosidase activity is a useful marker for this activation and a promising clinical biomarker and therapeutic monitor for nephropathic cystinosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,384,336
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,131
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,200
of 362,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#76
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.