↓ Skip to main content

Effects of proprioceptive exercises on pain and function in chronic neck- and low back pain rehabilitation: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of proprioceptive exercises on pain and function in chronic neck- and low back pain rehabilitation: a systematic literature review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A McCaskey, Corina Schuster-Amft, Brigitte Wirth, Zorica Suica, Eling D de Bruin

Abstract

Proprioceptive training (PrT) is popularly applied as preventive or rehabilitative exercise method in various sports and rehabilitation settings. Its effect on pain and function is only poorly evaluated. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and analyse the existing data on the effects of PrT on pain alleviation and functional restoration in patients with chronic (≥ 3 months) neck- or back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 482 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 19%
Student > Bachelor 87 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Researcher 32 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 93 19%
Unknown 113 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 21%
Sports and Recreations 49 10%
Neuroscience 13 3%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 130 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,311,530
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#459
of 4,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,901
of 368,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.