↓ Skip to main content

Motivations to eat healthily in older Dutch adults - a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivations to eat healthily in older Dutch adults - a cross sectional study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12966-014-0141-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Coosje Dijkstra, Judith E Neter, Ingeborg A Brouwer, Martijn Huisman, Marjolein Visser

Abstract

BackgroundTo influence dietary behaviors, more insight in food choice motivations is necessary. This study identified what motivations older adults have to eat healthily and investigated to what extent these motivations are particular to specific subgroups according to socio-economic position and other demographic, lifestyle and health characteristics.MethodsWe used data from 1,050 older Dutch adults who participated in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (65-80 years, independently living, normal cognitive status). Motivations to eat healthily and characteristics were measured with a self-reported questionnaire. We used logistic regression analyses to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI for the association between subgroups and motivations to eat healthily.ResultsThe most reported motivations to eat healthily were: ¿feeling fit¿ (51.7%), ¿current health¿ (49.7%) and ¿body weight¿ (39.2%). Multivariate analyses showed that older adults with chronic diseases (¿2 vs. no chronic disease OR: 4.41, 95% CI: 2.31-8.44) and a poor self-rated health (poor vs. good OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.22-3.73) were more likely to report ¿current disease¿ as a motivation to eat healthily. Groups from lower socio-economic positions were less likely to report ¿to prevent diseases¿ (low income vs. high OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86, low education vs. high OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.27-0.70) and older adults with obesity were less likely to report ¿current health¿ (obese vs. normal weight OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.69) as motivations to eat healthily.ConclusionMultivariate analyses showed that the presence of a disease in older adults is an important motivation for them to eat healthily, which might indicate that older adults with health problems are aware of the link between their disease and nutrition. Older adults from lower socio-economic positions or those with obesity require a specific approach because disease prevention seems to be of lesser importance for these groups, even though a healthy diet could improve their health. Future research should investigate the reasons behind the motives of low socio-economic position and obese older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Psychology 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#12,713,071
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,621
of 1,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,543
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#41
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.