↓ Skip to main content

Sanfilippo syndrome registry project and natural history studies: an example of patients, parents and researchers collaborating for a cure

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sanfilippo syndrome registry project and natural history studies: an example of patients, parents and researchers collaborating for a cure
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-9-s1-p7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Wood, Stuart Siedman, Jennifer Siedman, Paul Levy, Kyle Brown, Kim McBride, Kevin Flanigan, Raquel Marques, Arleta Feldman, Robert PleHcha, Sean Ekins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 44%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,310,749
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,788
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,934
of 258,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#41
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.