↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nela Cosic, Derek J Roberts, Henry T Stelfox

Abstract

Although abbreviated surgery with planned reoperation (damage control surgery) is now widely used to manage major trauma patients, the procedure and its component interventions have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While some have suggested the need for such trials, they are unlikely to be conducted because of patient safety concerns. As animal studies may overcome several of the limitations of existing observational damage control studies, the primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of damage control versus definitive surgery in experimental animal models of injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 4 13%